The Draft Common Frame of Reference as a "Toolbox" for Domestic Courts
The Draft Common Frame of Reference as a "Toolbox" for Domestic Courts
€84,95
/
Wat zijn de verschillende condities?
- Als nieuw: Zeer goede staat; er kunnen lichte gebruikssporen aanwezig zijn.
- Goed: In goede, nette staat met beperkte gebruikssporen. Denk aan een leesvouw of lichte rand-/hoekslijtage, een klein vlekje of verkleuring. Geen scheuren, losse pagina’s of grote beschadigingen; geen uitgebreide aantekeningen (hoogstens een naam of korte notitie).
- Gebruikt: Het boek kan een beschadiging hebben zoals een leesvouw in de rug, ezelsoren, vlekjes, verkleuring, deukjes, krasjes of slijtage. Ook kan er een boodschap of stempel voorin of achterin staan.
- Zeer gebruikt: Het boek heeft meerdere beschadigingen of bijzonderheden en/of er is (veel) geschreven op de pagina’s. Specifiek mogelijk: naam voorin, veel slijtage, kromme rug, grote vouw of kleine beschadiging.
This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes.
This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes. Special attention is paid to the concept of “legally relevant damage” and its importance in overcoming the deadlock created by the category of “pure economic loss” in the Portuguese and German tort law systems. These systems are essentially based on the concept of unlawfulness (“Rechtswidrigkeit”), which limits the compensation for pure economic loss to where a protective rule is infringed. These losses have nevertheless been compensated for through the extensive interpretation of rules and the appeal to near-contractual devices, which has been detrimental to legal certainty, the equality before the law, and subjects’ freedom of action. This book explains why courts can and should take a proactive role and apply DCFR-based solutions in order to compensate for every loss that is worthy of legal protection.
This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes. Special attention is paid to the concept of “legally relevant damage” and its importance in overcoming the deadlock created by the category of “pure economic loss” in the Portuguese and German tort law systems. These systems are essentially based on the concept of unlawfulness (“Rechtswidrigkeit”), which limits the compensation for pure economic loss to where a protective rule is infringed. These losses have nevertheless been compensated for through the extensive interpretation of rules and the appeal to near-contractual devices, which has been detrimental to legal certainty, the equality before the law, and subjects’ freedom of action. This book explains why courts can and should take a proactive role and apply DCFR-based solutions in order to compensate for every loss that is worthy of legal protection.
EAN: 9783319529226
